Law firms face a critical decision: invest in SEO for long-term organic traffic or pay for immediate PPC results. The choice impacts your client acquisition cost (CAC) for years to come.
Most firms default to PPC because it's measurable and fast. You spend $500, you get 3 consultations, you sign 1 case. The math is simple. But this creates a dependency on paid ads that never ends.
## The Efficiency Problem with PPCPPC client acquisition efficiency remains constant. If you're paying $500 per case today, you'll pay $500 per case next year—or more as competition increases. There's no compounding benefit.
Your cost per click stays the same. Your conversion rate stays the same. Your CAC stays the same. Forever.
"Every case requires the same ad spend. There's no leverage. You're renting traffic, not owning it."## How SEO Efficiency Compounds
SEO works differently. Initial investment is higher, but client acquisition efficiency improves over time as rankings compound:
- Month 1-3: Technical fixes, on-page optimization, citation building. High cost, minimal traffic.
- Month 4-6: Rankings appear for long-tail keywords. First organic cases close. CAC is still high ($2,000-3,000 per case).
- Month 7-12: Authority builds, more keywords rank. Organic traffic increases 200-400%. CAC drops to $800-1,200 per case.
- Year 2+: Compounding continues. Organic traffic grows without proportional investment. CAC drops to $300-600 per case.
After 18 months, SEO-driven cases often cost 70-80% less than PPC cases. The asset you built continues producing clients with minimal ongoing cost.
## Real Numbers: Personal Injury ExampleA personal injury firm in Dallas spent $60,000 on SEO over 12 months:
- Month 1-6: 8 cases closed from organic search ($7,500 CAC)
- Month 7-12: 24 cases closed from organic search ($2,500 CAC)
- Month 13-18: 45 cases closed from organic search ($1,333 CAC)
- Month 19-24: 72 cases closed from organic search ($833 CAC)
Compare this to PPC, where CAC would remain at $1,500-2,000 per case indefinitely.
## When PPC Makes SensePPC isn't wrong—it's just different. Use PPC when:
- You need cases immediately (new practice, cash flow needs)
- You're targeting seasonal practice areas (tax law, estate planning in Q4)
- You want to test new practice areas before SEO investment
- You operate in ultra-competitive markets where SEO takes 18+ months
The optimal strategy combines both: PPC for immediate cases while SEO builds your long-term asset.
## The Ownership PrincipleSEO creates owned traffic. Your website ranks, your content attracts clients, your brand becomes the authority. When you stop paying, the traffic doesn't disappear overnight.
PPC creates rented traffic. The moment you stop paying, traffic stops. Zero residual benefit.
Both have a place in law firm marketing. But only one builds an asset that compounds.
## Key TakeawayIf your goal is sustainable client acquisition with decreasing CAC over time, SEO is the strategic choice. If you need cases now and are comfortable with fixed CAC forever, PPC works.
Most successful firms do both: PPC for immediate revenue, SEO for compounding efficiency.